Customizing what happens in `fit()` with TensorFlow
Source:vignettes/custom_train_step_in_tensorflow.Rmd
custom_train_step_in_tensorflow.Rmd
Introduction
When you’re doing supervised learning, you can use fit()
and everything works smoothly.
When you need to take control of every little detail, you can write your own training loop entirely from scratch.
But what if you need a custom training algorithm, but you still want
to benefit from the convenient features of fit()
, such as
callbacks, built-in distribution support, or step fusing?
A core principle of Keras is progressive disclosure of complexity. You should always be able to get into lower-level workflows in a gradual way. You shouldn’t fall off a cliff if the high-level functionality doesn’t exactly match your use case. You should be able to gain more control over the small details while retaining a commensurate amount of high-level convenience.
When you need to customize what fit()
does, you should
override the training step function of the Model
class. This is the function that is called by
fit()
for every batch of data. You will then be able to
call fit()
as usual – and it will be running your own
learning algorithm.
Note that this pattern does not prevent you from building models with
the Functional API. You can do this whether you’re building
Sequential
models, Functional API models, or subclassed
models.
Let’s see how that works.
Setup
library(reticulate)
library(tensorflow, exclude = c("set_random_seed", "shape"))
library(keras3)
A first simple example
Let’s start from a simple example:
- We create a new class that subclasses
Model
. - We just override the method
train_step(self, data)
. - We return a dictionary mapping metric names (including the loss) to their current value.
The input argument data
is what gets passed to fit as
training data:
- If you pass arrays, by calling
fit(x, y, ...)
, thendata
will be the list(x, y)
- If you pass a
tf_dataset
, by callingfit(dataset, ...)
, thendata
will be what gets yielded bydataset
at each batch.
In the body of the train_step()
method, we implement a
regular training update, similar to what you are already familiar with.
Importantly, we compute the loss via
self.compute_loss()
, which wraps the loss(es)
function(s) that were passed to compile()
.
Similarly, we call metric$update_state(y, y_pred)
on
metrics from self$metrics
, to update the state of the
metrics that were passed in compile()
, and we query results
from self$metrics
at the end to retrieve their current
value.
CustomModel <- new_model_class(
"CustomModel",
train_step = function(data) {
c(x, y = NULL, sample_weight = NULL) %<-% data
with(tf$GradientTape() %as% tape, {
y_pred <- self(x, training = TRUE)
loss <- self$compute_loss(y = y, y_pred = y_pred,
sample_weight = sample_weight)
})
# Compute gradients
trainable_vars <- self$trainable_variables
gradients <- tape$gradient(loss, trainable_vars)
# Update weights
self$optimizer$apply(gradients, trainable_vars)
# Update metrics (includes the metric that tracks the loss)
for (metric in self$metrics) {
if (metric$name == "loss")
metric$update_state(loss)
else
metric$update_state(y, y_pred)
}
# Return a dict mapping metric names to current value
metrics <- lapply(self$metrics, function(m) m$result())
metrics <- setNames(metrics, sapply(self$metrics, function(m) m$name))
metrics
}
)
Let’s try this out:
# Construct and compile an instance of CustomModel
inputs <- keras_input(shape = 32)
outputs <- layer_dense(inputs, 1)
model <- CustomModel(inputs, outputs)
model |> compile(optimizer = "adam", loss = "mse", metrics = "mae")
# Just use `fit` as usual
x <- random_normal(c(1000, 32))
y <- random_normal(c(1000, 1))
model |> fit(x, y, epochs = 3)
## Epoch 1/3
## 32/32 - 1s - 23ms/step - loss: 3.2271 - mae: 1.4339
## Epoch 2/3
## 32/32 - 0s - 1ms/step - loss: 2.9034 - mae: 1.3605
## Epoch 3/3
## 32/32 - 0s - 1ms/step - loss: 2.6272 - mae: 1.2960
Going lower-level
Naturally, you could just skip passing a loss function in
compile()
, and instead do everything manually in
train_step
. Likewise for metrics.
Here’s a lower-level example, that only uses compile()
to configure the optimizer:
- We start by creating
Metric
instances to track our loss and a MAE score (in__init__()
). - We implement a custom
train_step()
that updates the state of these metrics (by callingupdate_state()
on them), then query them (viaresult()
) to return their current average value, to be displayed by the progress bar and to be pass to any callback. - Note that we would need to call
reset_states()
on our metrics between each epoch! Otherwise callingresult()
would return an average since the start of training, whereas we usually work with per-epoch averages. Thankfully, the framework can do that for us: just list any metric you want to reset in themetrics
property of the model. The model will callreset_states()
on any object listed here at the beginning of eachfit()
epoch or at the beginning of a call toevaluate()
.
CustomModel <- new_model_class(
"CustomModel",
initialize = function(...) {
super$initialize(...)
self$loss_tracker <- metric_mean(name = "loss")
self$mae_metric <- metric_mean_absolute_error(name = "mae")
self$loss_fn <- loss_mean_squared_error()
},
train_step = function(data) {
c(x, y = NULL, sample_weight = NULL) %<-% data
with(tf$GradientTape() %as% tape, {
y_pred <- self(x, training = TRUE)
loss <- self$loss_fn(y, y_pred, sample_weight = sample_weight)
})
# Compute gradients
trainable_vars <- self$trainable_variables
gradients <- tape$gradient(loss, trainable_vars)
# Update weights
self$optimizer$apply(gradients, trainable_vars)
# Compute our own metrics
self$loss_tracker$update_state(loss)
self$mae_metric$update_state(y, y_pred)
# Return a dict mapping metric names to current value
list(
loss = self$loss_tracker$result(),
mae = self$mae_metric$result()
)
},
metrics = mark_active(function() {
# We list our `Metric` objects here so that `reset_states()` can be
# called automatically at the start of each epoch
# or at the start of `evaluate()`.
list(self$loss_tracker, self$mae_metric)
})
)
# Construct and compile an instance of CustomModel
inputs <- keras_input(shape = 32)
outputs <- layer_dense(inputs, 1)
model <- CustomModel(inputs, outputs)
# We don't pass a loss or metrics here.
model |> compile(optimizer = "adam")
# Just use `fit` as usual
x <- random_normal(c(1000, 32))
y <- random_normal(c(1000, 1))
model |> fit(x, y, epochs = 3)
## Epoch 1/3
## 32/32 - 1s - 22ms/step - loss: 2.5170 - mae: 1.2923
## Epoch 2/3
## 32/32 - 0s - 1ms/step - loss: 2.2689 - mae: 1.2241
## Epoch 3/3
## 32/32 - 0s - 1ms/step - loss: 2.0578 - mae: 1.1633
Supporting sample_weight
&
class_weight
You may have noticed that our first basic example didn’t make any
mention of sample weighting. If you want to support the
fit()
arguments sample_weight
and
class_weight
, you’d simply do the following:
- Unpack
sample_weight
from thedata
argument - Pass it to
compute_loss
&update_state
(of course, you could also just apply it manually if you don’t rely oncompile()
for losses & metrics) - That’s it.
CustomModel <- new_model_class(
"CustomModel",
train_step = function(data) {
c(x, y = NULL, sample_weight = NULL) %<-% data
with(tf$GradientTape() %as% tape, {
y_pred <- self(x, training = TRUE)
loss <- self$compute_loss(y = y, y_pred = y_pred,
sample_weight = sample_weight)
})
# Compute gradients
trainable_vars <- self$trainable_variables
gradients <- tape$gradient(loss, trainable_vars)
# Update weights
self$optimizer$apply_gradients(zip_lists(gradients, trainable_vars))
# Update metrics (includes the metric that tracks the loss)
for (metric in self$metrics) {
if (metric$name == "loss") {
metric$update_state(loss)
} else {
metric$update_state(y, y_pred, sample_weight = sample_weight)
}
}
# Return a dict mapping metric names to current value
metrics <- lapply(self$metrics, function(m) m$result())
metrics <- setNames(metrics, sapply(self$metrics, function(m) m$name))
metrics
}
)
# Construct and compile an instance of CustomModel
inputs <- keras_input(shape = 32)
outputs <- layer_dense(inputs, units = 1)
model <- CustomModel(inputs, outputs)
model |> compile(optimizer = "adam", loss = "mse", metrics = "mae")
# You can now use sample_weight argument
x <- random_normal(c(1000, 32))
y <- random_normal(c(1000, 1))
sw <- random_normal(c(1000, 1))
model |> fit(x, y, sample_weight = sw, epochs = 3)
## Epoch 1/3
## 32/32 - 1s - 26ms/step - loss: 0.1681 - mae: 1.3434
## Epoch 2/3
## 32/32 - 0s - 9ms/step - loss: 0.1394 - mae: 1.3364
## Epoch 3/3
## 32/32 - 0s - 1ms/step - loss: 0.1148 - mae: 1.3286
Providing your own evaluation step
What if you want to do the same for calls to
model.evaluate()
? Then you would override
test_step
in exactly the same way. Here’s what it looks
like:
CustomModel <- new_model_class(
"CustomModel",
test_step = function(data) {
# Unpack the data
c(x, y = NULL, sw = NULL) %<-% data
# Compute predictions
y_pred = self(x, training = FALSE)
# Updates the metrics tracking the loss
self$compute_loss(y = y, y_pred = y_pred, sample_weight = sw)
# Update the metrics.
for (metric in self$metrics) {
if (metric$name != "loss") {
metric$update_state(y, y_pred, sample_weight = sw)
}
}
# Return a dict mapping metric names to current value.
# Note that it will include the loss (tracked in self.metrics).
metrics <- lapply(self$metrics, function(m) m$result())
metrics <- setNames(metrics, sapply(self$metrics, function(m) m$name))
metrics
}
)
# Construct an instance of CustomModel
inputs <- keras_input(shape = 32)
outputs <- layer_dense(inputs, 1)
model <- CustomModel(inputs, outputs)
model |> compile(loss = "mse", metrics = "mae")
# Evaluate with our custom test_step
x <- random_normal(c(1000, 32))
y <- random_normal(c(1000, 1))
model |> evaluate(x, y)
## 32/32 - 0s - 10ms/step - loss: 0.0000e+00 - mae: 1.3871
## $loss
## [1] 0
##
## $mae
## [1] 1.387149
Wrapping up: an end-to-end GAN example
Let’s walk through an end-to-end example that leverages everything you just learned.
Let’s consider:
- A generator network meant to generate 28x28x1 images.
- A discriminator network meant to classify 28x28x1 images into two classes (“fake” and “real”).
- One optimizer for each.
- A loss function to train the discriminator.
# Create the discriminator
discriminator <-
keras_model_sequential(name = "discriminator", input_shape = c(28, 28, 1)) |>
layer_conv_2d(filters = 64, kernel_size = c(3, 3),
strides = c(2, 2), padding = "same") |>
layer_activation_leaky_relu(negative_slope = 0.2) |>
layer_conv_2d(filters = 128, kernel_size = c(3, 3),
strides = c(2, 2), padding = "same") |>
layer_activation_leaky_relu(negative_slope = 0.2) |>
layer_global_max_pooling_2d() |>
layer_dense(units = 1)
# Create the generator
latent_dim <- 128
generator <-
keras_model_sequential(name = "generator", input_shape = latent_dim) |>
layer_dense(7 * 7 * 128) |>
layer_activation_leaky_relu(negative_slope = 0.2) |>
layer_reshape(target_shape = c(7, 7, 128)) |>
layer_conv_2d_transpose(filters = 128, kernel_size = c(4, 4),
strides = c(2, 2), padding = "same") |>
layer_activation_leaky_relu(negative_slope = 0.2) |>
layer_conv_2d_transpose(filters = 128, kernel_size = c(4, 4),
strides = c(2, 2), padding = "same") |>
layer_activation_leaky_relu(negative_slope = 0.2) |>
layer_conv_2d(filters = 1, kernel_size = c(7, 7), padding = "same",
activation = "sigmoid")
Here’s a feature-complete GAN class, overriding
compile()
to use its own signature, and implementing the
entire GAN algorithm in 17 lines in train_step
:
GAN <- Model(
classname = "GAN",
initialize = function(discriminator, generator, latent_dim, ...) {
super$initialize(...)
self$discriminator <- discriminator
self$generator <- generator
self$latent_dim <- as.integer(latent_dim)
self$d_loss_tracker <- metric_mean(name = "d_loss")
self$g_loss_tracker <- metric_mean(name = "g_loss")
},
compile = function(d_optimizer, g_optimizer, loss_fn, ...) {
super$compile(...)
self$d_optimizer <- d_optimizer
self$g_optimizer <- g_optimizer
self$loss_fn <- loss_fn
},
metrics = active_property(function() {
list(self$d_loss_tracker, self$g_loss_tracker)
}),
train_step = function(real_images) {
# Sample random points in the latent space
batch_size <- shape(real_images)[[1]]
random_latent_vectors <-
tf$random$normal(shape(batch_size, self$latent_dim))
# Decode them to fake images
generated_images <- self$generator(random_latent_vectors)
# Combine them with real images
combined_images <- op_concatenate(list(generated_images,
real_images))
# Assemble labels discriminating real from fake images
labels <- op_concatenate(list(op_ones(c(batch_size, 1)),
op_zeros(c(batch_size, 1))))
# Add random noise to the labels - important trick!
labels %<>% `+`(tf$random$uniform(shape(.), maxval = 0.05))
# Train the discriminator
with(tf$GradientTape() %as% tape, {
predictions <- self$discriminator(combined_images)
d_loss <- self$loss_fn(labels, predictions)
})
grads <- tape$gradient(d_loss, self$discriminator$trainable_weights)
self$d_optimizer$apply_gradients(
zip_lists(grads, self$discriminator$trainable_weights))
# Sample random points in the latent space
random_latent_vectors <-
tf$random$normal(shape(batch_size, self$latent_dim))
# Assemble labels that say "all real images"
misleading_labels <- op_zeros(c(batch_size, 1))
# Train the generator (note that we should *not* update the weights
# of the discriminator)!
with(tf$GradientTape() %as% tape, {
predictions <- self$discriminator(self$generator(random_latent_vectors))
g_loss <- self$loss_fn(misleading_labels, predictions)
})
grads <- tape$gradient(g_loss, self$generator$trainable_weights)
self$g_optimizer$apply_gradients(
zip_lists(grads, self$generator$trainable_weights))
list(d_loss = d_loss, g_loss = g_loss)
}
)
Let’s test-drive it:
batch_size <- 64
c(c(x_train, .), c(x_test, .)) %<-% dataset_mnist()
all_digits <- op_concatenate(list(x_train, x_test))
all_digits <- op_reshape(all_digits, c(-1, 28, 28, 1))
dataset <- all_digits |>
tfdatasets::tensor_slices_dataset() |>
tfdatasets::dataset_map(\(x) op_cast(x, "float32") / 255) |>
tfdatasets::dataset_shuffle(buffer_size = 1024) |>
tfdatasets::dataset_batch(batch_size = batch_size)
gan <- GAN(discriminator = discriminator,
generator = generator,
latent_dim = latent_dim)
gan |> compile(
d_optimizer = optimizer_adam(learning_rate = 0.0003),
g_optimizer = optimizer_adam(learning_rate = 0.0003),
loss_fn = loss_binary_crossentropy(from_logits = TRUE)
)
# To limit the execution time, we only train on 100 batches. You can train on
# the entire dataset. You will need about 20 epochs to get nice results.
gan |> fit(
tfdatasets::dataset_take(dataset, 100),
epochs = 1
)
## 100/100 - 5s - 54ms/step - d_loss: 0.0000e+00 - g_loss: 0.0000e+00
The ideas behind deep learning are simple, so why should their implementation be painful?